Bontoc fortifying rice terraces
Statement of responsibility: Charles Martinby
Martin, Charles
.
Type: 


Archaeologists have three theories on the origin of rice terracing in the Philippines. It could be (1) an indigenous practice, unique to the isolated mountain area; (2) the product of imported technology from a neighboring land such as China; (3) due to influences coming from south of the Philippines. Research shows, however, that terracing could not have come from China: the Chinese traders stayed on shore and the natives took the goods from them and brought them inland. It seems more plausible that the terrace-building practiced in the Philippines originated from Sumatra, Java, Formosa, and, perhaps, Japan (Jenks, 88-89). (See also PE01164.)Image type: Reproduction: Photograph
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Filipinas Heritage Library | Retrato - Peoples | PE00707 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | PE00707 |
Browsing Filipinas Heritage Library shelves,Collection: Retrato - Peoples Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Archaeologists have three theories on the origin of rice terracing in the Philippines. It could be (1) an indigenous practice, unique to the isolated mountain area; (2) the product of imported technology from a neighboring land such as China; (3) due to influences coming from south of the Philippines. Research shows, however, that terracing could not have come from China: the Chinese traders stayed on shore and the natives took the goods from them and brought them inland. It seems more plausible that the terrace-building practiced in the Philippines originated from Sumatra, Java, Formosa, and, perhaps, Japan (Jenks, 88-89). (See also PE01164.)
A terrace wall. Caption Note)
There are no comments on this title.